نقش شش عامل شخصیت هگزاکو در تمایل به رفتار اطلاع‌جویی مشارکتی دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه شیراز - - - شیراز- دانشگاه شیراز
2 دانشیار دانشگاه شیراز - - شیراز- دانشگاه شیراز
3 استادیار دانشگاه شیراز - - - شیراز- دانشگاه شیراز
چکیده
هدف: امروزه رفتار اطلاع­جویی مشارکتی مورد توجه پژوهشگران بسیاری بوده‎است و برای رفع نیازهای اطلاعاتی و حل چالش‎های سخت و پیچیده، ضروری بنظر می­رسد. هدف پژوهش حاضر شناخت تأثیر شش عامل شخصیت هگزاکو بر تمایل به رفتار اطلاع­جویی مشارکتی دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز است.

روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف بنیادی و از نظر نوع پژوهش کمّی از نوع توصیفی-همبستگی است. جامعه­ آماری شامل کلیه­ دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه شیراز در سال­های 1400-1401 است. نمونه این پژوهش به شیوه تصادفی نسبتی و از بین دانشجویان دانشکده­های مختلف بر مبنای جدول کوکران مورگان به تعداد 231 نفر محاسبه شد. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه زارع و همکاران (1401) با پایایی طبق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ با مقدار 908/0 و پرسشنامه شش عامل شخصیت هگزاکو دی­ وریزا (2013) با روایی محتوایی و صوری و ملاکی ارزیابی شده و پایایی بر طبق آلفای کرونباخ بالای 7/0 بود.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد از بین زیر مؤلفه­های شخصیت، زیر مؤلفه­ صداقت-تواضع با ضریب تبیین 0.24 درصد بیشترین تأثیر مثبت را بر تمایل به رفتار اطلاع­جویی مشارکتی داشت و نشان داد، شخصیت و برخی زیر مؤلفه­های آن می­توانند تمایل به رفتارهای اطلاع­جویی مشارکتی را پیش­بینی نماید.

اصالت/ارزش: با توجه به خلاء پژوهشی موجود در زمینه شناخت عوامل تأثیرگذار بر رفتار اطلاع‎جویی مشارکتی، شناسایی یکی از عوامل مهم فردی تأثیرگذار بر این رفتار را می‎توان تلاشی در جهت شناخت این حوزه علمی دانست. به‎علاوه، نتایج این پژوهش به تمامی افراد، اعم از پژوهشگران، اساتید و مدیران کمک خواهد کرد تا با شناخت و سرمایه‎گذاری در راستای تقویت و بهبود بعد صداقت-تواضع، در جهت تسهیل حرکت به سمت رفتارهای اطلاع‎جویی مشارکتی گام بردارند. همچنین زمینه سـازی بـرای ارتقـای کـارکرد سامانه‎های اطلاعاتی مشارکتی با لحـاظ‌نمـودن متغیرهای روانشـناختی در فضـاهای حاکم بر اطلاع‎جویی مشارکتی از مسائل مهم برگرفته از این پـژوهش است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The role of the Hexaco model of personality in the willingness to Collaborative Information-searching behavior of Shiraz University students

نویسندگان English

Mohadeseh Tahririfard 1
Mahdieh Mirzabeigi 2
Tahereh Jowkar 3
1 student shiraz university - - - shiraz university-shiraz
2 associate professor shiraz university - - - shiraz university-shiraz
3 assistant professor shiraz university - - - shiraz university-shiraz
چکیده English

Objective: Collaborative information-seeking behavior has become a hot topic among researchers, as it is essential to meet the complex and challenging information needs of people. This study aims to investigate the impact of six personality factors of the HEXACO model on the tendency of Shiraz University students towards collaborative information-seeking behavior.

Methods: The research tools included the Zares Questionnaire (2021) that its reliability was obtained from Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α=0.908) and The personality questionnaire of HEXACO di Veriza (2013) that it’s validity has been evaluated from the point of view of content, face, and criteria, and its reliability coefficient has been calculated above 0.7 for this research.

Results: The results showed that among the personality factors, the honesty-humility (H) factor (B=0.237) had the most significant positive effect on the tendency towards collaborative information-seeking behavior.

originality / value: Considering the existing research gap in the of identifying factors affecting collaborative information seeking behavior, identifying one of the important individual factors affecting this behavior can be considered an attempt to understand this scientific field. In addition, the results of this study will help all individuals, including researchers, professors, and managers, to take steps to strengthen and improve the honesty-humility dimension by recognizing and investing in it, in order to facilitate the movement towards collaborative information seeking behaviors. Also, laying the groundwork for improving the performance of collaborative information systems by considering psychological variables in the spaces governing collaborative information seeking is one of the important issues derived from this study.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Collaborative information seeking
hexaco dimensions
honesty-humility
Personality
Ahmadi, Sirous, & Kargar, Saeed (2013). Study of women's attitudes towards sports participation and socio-psychological factors affecting it. Applied Sociology (Research Journal of Humanities, University of Isfahan), 24(4 (52 consecutive issues)), 189-210. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/401712/fa
Afshar, Gholamreza, Saleh Ardestani, Abbas, & Mirabi, Vahidreza (2011). Expectations and enabling users on cyberspace participation behavior. Behavioral Studies in Management, 12(26), 105-122. (in Persian)
Akbari, B., Askarian, F., jafari, S., & Akbari, N. (2017). Impact of Socio–Economic factors on sports participation in Maragheh Households. Sport Management and Development, 6(1), 105-116. doi: 10.22124/jsmd.2017.2448. (in Persian)
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and social psychology review, 11(2), 150-166.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXA CO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of personality assessment, 91(4), 340-345. doi=abs/10.1080/00223890902935878
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & De Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139-152. doi=10.1.1.888.1371&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., ... & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(2), 356. doi=10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
Babaei, Kobra, & Bigdali, Zahed. (2015). The need to understand the collaborative information behavior of master's students in psychology and educational sciences at Allameh Tabatabaei University. Human Information Interaction, 2(1), 12-20. SID https://sid.ir/paper/260337/fa. (in Persian)Barr, D. (2006). Staying alert: The wild new world of current awareness services. College & research libraries news, 67(1), 14-17.
Bates, M. J. (2010). Information behavior. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 3, 2381-2391.
Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic perspectives, 9(2), 209-219.
chaboki, A. (2002). Political Cinema of Iran and Women Directors. Social Sciences, 9(19), 107-135. (in Persian)
Davarpanah, Mohammad Reza (2002). Searching for scientific and research information in printed and electronic sources. Tehran: Dabizh. (in Persian)
Dehdashti, Z., & Behyar, P. (2018). Effects of Personal and Social Factors on Consumers’ Participation in Virtual Communities. Journal of Business Management, 10(1), 121-144. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2018.218674.2322. (in Persian)
Fardin, Zahra (2016). Investigating participatory information seeking behavior of graduate students at Zabol University. Master's thesis, Payam Noor University, Mashhad Center. (in Persian)
Farhoudi, Faezeh (2015). The effect of personality traits of master's degree students in information science and knowledge studies on their information seeking behavior. Quarterly Journal of Knowledge Studies, 8(30), 87-96. (in Persian)
Ganji, M., Niazi, M., & Heydarian, A. (2018). The Study of Social Factors Influencing Cultural Participation at University Space. Journal of Applied Sociology, 29(3), 19-40. doi: 10.22108/jas.2018.98652.0. (in Persian)
Ghitulescu, B. E. (2018). Psychosocial effects of proactivity: The interplay between proactive and collaborative behavior. Personnel Review. doi=10.1108/PR-08-2016-0209/full/html
Granikov, V., El Sherif, R., Bouthillier, F., & Pluye, P. (2022). Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking: A mixed studies review with a framework synthesis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(4), 542-560. doi= 10.1002/asi.24596
Guo, Z., Li, W., Yang, Y., & Kou, Y. (2021). Honesty-Humility and unethical behavior in adolescents: The mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of system justification. Journal of Adolescence, 90, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.05.009
Halder, S., Roy, A., & Chakraborty, P. K. (2010). The influence of personality traits on information seeking behaviour of students. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(1), 41-53.
Hernández-Pérez, O. (2017). Collaborative information behaviour in completely online groups: Exploring the social dimensions of information in virtual environments. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(4), 775-787.
Hertzum, M., & Hansen, P. (2019). Empirical studies of collaborative information seeking: A review of methodological issues. Journal of documentation, 75(1), 140–163.
Hosseini, Hossein, Ghahraman Tabrizi, Kourosh, & Sharifian, Esmaeil (2019). Study of individual and social factors affecting sports participation of police officers. Health and Development, 9(2), 167-175. (in Persian)
Inanloo, M., Bashardoust, S., & Abolmaali Alhosseini, K. (2022). The modeling structural prediction of online games addiction based on HEXACO personality and parent-child relationships with role mediator impulsivity. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 3(1), 285-310. doi: 10.22034/aftj.2022.293484.1131 . (in Persian)
Jang, H. W., & Park, S. W. (2016). Effects of personality traits on collaborative performance in problem-based learning tutorials. Saudi Medical Journal, 37(12), 1365.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. ASCD.
Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty–Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual differences, 50(6), 857-862.
Kang, J. H. (2019). Lonely collaborative information behavior (CIB) of youth. iConference 2019 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103324
karimkhani A, neshat N. (2016). The relationship between the big five personality information-seeking behavior of graduate students. Human Information Interaction, 3 (3). (in Persian)
Karunakaran, A., & Reddy, M. (2012). Barriers to collaborative information seeking in organizations. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1-10.
Khezri, Setareh, & Manavipour, Davud (2016). Psychometric properties of the Hexa-Co personality questionnaire among students. Journal of Neuroscience, Shafai Khatam, 4 (4), 50-60. (in Persian)
Knight, S., & Mercer, N. (2017). Collaborative epistemic discourse in classroom information-seeking tasks. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1159978
Leeder, C., & Shah, C. (2016). Collaborative information seeking in student group projects. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(5), 526-544. Doi=10.1108/AJIM-12-2015-0190
Masoudnia, H., Mohammadifar, N., Moradi, G., & Foroughi, A. (2013). A Study of the Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Political Participation among University Professors: research subject: University of Isfahan. Journal of Applied Sociology, 23(4), 103-124. (in Persian)
McNeese, N. J., & Reddy, M. C. (2017). The role of team cognition in collaborative information seeking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1),129-140. doi=abs/10.1002/asi.23614
Morris, M. R., & Teevan, J. (2009). Collaborative web search: Who, what, where, when, and why. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-99.
Reddy, M. C., Jansen, B. J., & Spence, P. R. (2010). Collaborative information behavior: Exploring collaboration and coordination during information seeking and retrieval activities. In Collaborative information behavior: User engagement and communication sharing (pp. 73-88). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-61520-797-8.ch005
Rosse RB.(2011). The love trauma syndrome: free yourself from the pain of a broken heart. Paris: Hachette Books.
Sangari M, Jamali H. (2018) An Investigation into Digital Library Users' Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS) of Graduate Students of Kharazmi University with an emphasis on two easy and difficult scenarios. Human Information Interaction, 5 (2). (in Persian)
Shah, C. (2012). Collaborative information seeking: The art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all (Vol. 34). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28813-5
Shamloo, Saeed (2005). Schools and Theories in Personality Psychology, Tehran: Roshd. (in Persian)
Shokri O, Moradi A, Farzad V E, Sangari A, Ghanai Z, & Rezaei A. (2005). The Role of Personality Traits and Coping Styles on University Student's Mental Health: Introducing Causal Models. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (1) :28-38. (in Persian)
Talja, S., Keso, H., & Pietiläinen, T. (1999). The production of ‘context’in information seeking research: a metatheoretical view. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 751-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00024-2
Tangney, J. P. (2002). Humility. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 411–419). London: Oxford University Press.
Tidwell, M., & Sias, P. (2005). Personality and information seeking: Understanding how traits influence information-seeking behaviors. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 42(1), 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943604272028
Wang, J. (2016). Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration. Research Policy, 45(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.003
Widen, G., & Hansen, P. (2012). Managing collaborative information sharing: bridging research on information culture and collaborative information behavior.
Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56.
Worthington, jun, E. L. (1998). An empathy‐humility commitment model of forgiveness applied within family dyads. Journal of Family therapy, 20(1), 59-76. DOI:10.1111/1467-6427.00068
Wu, D., Liang, S., & Yu, W. (2018). Collaborative information searching as learning in academic group work. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(1), 2-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2017-0063
Wu, D., Liang, S., Dong, J., & Qiu, J. (2018). Impact of task types on collaborative information seeking behavior. Libri, 68(3), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2017-0051
yazdanpanah, L., & hoseyn panahi, M. (2004). The Impact of Individual Characteristics on Social Participation. Social Sciences, 11(26), 69-107. (in Persian)
zare Z, mirzabeigi M, & sotudeh H. (2022). The effect of trust on collaborative information seeking behavior of postgraduate students of Shiraz University. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 28 (2) :54-68. (in Persian)
Zeinali V, & Mahdavi M S. (2014). Triggers and Barriers of Collaborative Information Behavior (CIB) Among Physicians: A Qualitative Study. Human Information Interaction, 1 (2). (in Persian)