A functional model for assessing Iran's cinematic websites

Authors
TMU
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Today, websites with diverse and varied uses have revolutionized all social, scientific, educational, artistic, commercial, and other fields of thought. In the meantime, the cinema has not gone away with this technological advancement, and a large number of cinema websites have been set up to help film makers in this field. Whatever the users of a website, the main purpose and the main goals is to provide quick and easy service and to satisfy users, and this goal is achieved only with the assurance of their efficiency and performance review and performance measurement. Web sites are not possible except by evaluating them. Only this way, one can see the strengths and weaknesses of the Web sites, and they have taken steps to refine or complete their progress and development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cinematic websites of Iran based on the three-level pyramid model.

Methodology: Using evaluative method, 38 Iranian cinemas were evaluated using two public and specialized criteria. Using these two logos, not screening, navigation, content, availability, interaction, informational services, special services, multimedia services, and customer service have been evaluated.

Results: The evaluation results show that Iran's cinema websites are based on the three-level pyramid model, which are general criteria, at a good level, in the middle of the pyramid with appropriate specialized standards at the head of the pyramid consisting of Specialized criteria are at the right level.

Conclusion: A fully cinematic web site is considered to include at least two criteria for special services and customer service at the head of the pyramid, one in a highly professional and user-friendly manner, and at the level of the best of the same foreign websites Have your website. It seems that Iran's cinematic websites are beginning to work on this and need more activity and experience.

Keywords

Asghari, S., Kowsari, M., (2013). Religious blogs in clerics in Iran Evaluation of three-level pyramid patterns. Cultural Social Knowledge, 4(2):55-72.
Alwankar, E. S., (2010). Web site evaluation of Irani-an museums using Meiosim Kual. Master's thesis. Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Manage-ment and Economics, Department of Information Science and Knowledge.
Quranbase, F., (2011). Reviewing and ranking Per-sian websites of Shia religion using the standards of Silbergs SMAR. T and Action Furelles. Information Research and Public Libraries, 2 (17): 305-336.
Janatyan, Sima; Majiri, Shahin; Shahrazadi; Leila; Zahedi; Razieh; Ashrafi Rizi; Hasan. (1393). Eval-uation of the Quality of Persian Depression Web Pages Based on the Quality of Web Model Scale. Health Management, 17 (55): 89-98.
Extract, F., (2002). Criteria for Internet resource evaluation. National studies on librarianship and information organization, 13 (1), 73-62.
Kashifi, O., Time, O., A., Beneficent, B., Kanaani, K., (2010) Evaluation and ranking of websites. Teh-ran: Secretariat of the Supreme Council of Infor-mation Services.
Moeini, A., Musa Khani, M., Hassanzadeh, A., Farazmand, E., (2014). Web site evaluation by ag-gregation of previous models based on quantitative method. Information Technology Management, 6 (4): 675-700.
Najboghlylynezhad, A., Hasanzadeh, M., Sadeghza-deh Voyehan, A., (2011). Virtual World: Features, Rules, Methods and Evaluation Tools. Tehran: Li-brarian.
Bastida, U., Huan, T.C., (2014). Performance evalua-tion of tourism websites' information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei. Journal of Business Re-search,67(2): 167–170.
Poulin, E.T., (2008). A Whole New World of Freaks and Greaks: Libraries and Librarian on You Tube... Library and Information Science Research Elec-tronic Journal. vol 18, no2. Accessed 08/17/2012.
Raji, Sh., Mahmuda, M., Abubakrb, A., (2013). Eval-uation of University Teaching Hospital Websites in Nigeria. Procedia Technology 9.1058 – 1064.
Rocha, Á., (2012). Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Information Re-view, 36(3): 374-382.