رویکرد سنتز پژوهی به مفهوم سواد اطلاعاتی انتقادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
رضا ناصری جهرمی
مهدی محمدی
مرضیه عبدالوهابی
سولماز خادمی
مجید کوثری
صدیقه شادی
دانشگاه شیراز
چکیده
هدف: این پژوهش رویکرد سنتز پژوهی به مفهوم سواد اطلاعاتی انتقادی بود.

روش­شناسی: این پژوهش از نوع روش کیفی با استفاده از رویکرد پنج مرحله‌ای تفسیری-انتقادی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش متمرکز بر منابع دست اول نزدیک به زمینه پژوهش حاضر بود. معیار انتخاب مطالعات مورد بررسی همسویی و هم­راستایی با هدف، عنوان و متغیرهای پژوهش حاضر است ودر همین راستا جست­و ­جوی منابع با توجه به سئوال پژوهش و بر اساس دانش کسب شده از مرور پیشینه نظری صورت گرفت که واژگان کلیدی وارد شده در موتورها و پایگاه­های جست­و ­جوگر علمی مانند وب آف ساینس، گوگل اسکولار، ساینس دایرکت، الزیویر، اسکوپوس عبارت بودند از: رویکرد سنتزپژوهی، سواد رسانه­ای، سواد انتقادی، سواد اطلاعاتی_انتقادی و اخبار اطلاعاتی. پـس از آن که داده­هـای گردآوری شده به نقطه اشباع رسید و نیازی تا جایی که انتخاب مطالعات دیگر نیازی نبود، فرایند بررسی و تفسیر آغاز گرفت. یا­فته­های به دست­آمده از تحلیل و ترکیب گزارش­های پژوهشی عوامل مرتبط با سواد اطلاعاتی انتقادی در سه مضمون اصلی «علم‌سنجی سواد اطلاعاتی»، «همبستگی سواد اطلاعاتی و تفکر انتقادی» و «سواد اطلاعاتی رسانه‌ای» دسته‌بندی نمود.

نتیجه: درواقع یک شناخت، آگاهی، مهارت لازم با چارچوب استاندارد از سواد اطلاعاتی و انتقادی به صورت مستقل می تواند زیرساخت و بنیان مناسبی را برای تعامل سواد اطلاعاتی و سواد انتقادی فراهم آورد که سبب ایجاد تعادل و تعامل بین ظرفیت و توانائی های کنجکاوی, خلاقیت و قضاوت در افراد خواهد شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سنتزپژوهی
سواد اطلاعاتی
تفکر انتقادی
سواد اطلاعاتی انتقادی

عنوان مقاله English

Synthesis research approach to the concept of critical information literacy

نویسندگان English

Reza Naserijahromi
mehdi mohammadi
marzieh abdolvahabi
solmaz khademi
majid kowsari
sedigheh shadi
Shiraz university
چکیده English

Objective: This research was a synthesis research approach to the concept of critical information literacy.

Methodology: This research was a qualitative method using a five-stage interpretive-critical approach. The statistical population of this research focused on primary sources close to the field of the present study. The criterion for selecting the studies under study was alignment and coherence with the purpose, title, and variables of the present study. In this regard, the search for sources was carried out according to the research question and based on the knowledge gained from reviewing the theoretical background. The keywords entered in scientific search engines and databases such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Elsevier, Scopus were: synthesis research approach, media literacy, critical literacy, critical information literacy, and information news. After the collected data reached a saturation point and the need to select studies was no longer needed, the review and interpretation process began. The findings obtained from the analysis and synthesis of research reports related to critical information literacy were categorized into three main themes: "Scientometrics of Information Literacy", "Correlation of Information Literacy and Critical Thinking", and "Media Information Literacy".

Conclusion: In fact, a necessary knowledge, awareness, and skills with a standard framework of information and critical literacy can independently provide a suitable infrastructure and foundation for the interaction of information literacy and critical literacy, which will create a balance and interaction between the capacities and abilities of curiosity, creativity, and judgment in individuals.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

synthesis research
Information Literacy
Critical thinking
critical information literacy
1. رضایی، ریتا، پوربایرامیان، قدیر. (1395). بررسی ارتباط بین تفکر انتقادی و سواد اطلاعاتی در دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل. مجله ی سلامت و بهداشت. 376-366
2. علی‌نژاد، مهرانگیز(1393). ارتباط متقابل سواد اطلاعاتی و تفکر انتقادی، اولین کنفرانس ملی توسعه پایدار در علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، مطالعات اجتماعی و فرهنگی،تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/320887/
3. مومنی, عصمت. (1402). گسترش محتوای آموزشی برنامه درسی برونر با استفاده از مهارت های سواد اطلاعاتی و تفکر انتقادی. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات
4. هاشمی‌مقدم، سید شمس‌الدین. مسلمی، زهرا. (1396). رابطه‌ی مهارت‌های تفکر انتقادی و راهبردهای فراشناختی با سواد اطلاعاتی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی. مجله‌ی ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی. صص: 530-522
5. Al-Zou’bi, R. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782
6. Association of College and Research Libraries, A division of the American Library Association. The Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association; 2004. Available from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/ content/standards/standards.pdf
7. Carroll, C. (2017). Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines. Bmj, 356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j80 (Published 16 January 2017)
8. Cloudesley, SP. 2021. “‘Informed’, ‘Active’ and ‘Engaged’? Understanding and Enacting Information Literacy from a UK Citizenship Perspective.” Journal of Information Literacy 15 (3): 20–40.
9. Crist, C. A., Duncan, S. E., & Bianchi, L. M. (2017). Incorporation of cross‐ disciplinary teaching and a wiki research project to engage undergraduate students to develop information literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills. Journal of food science education, 16(3), 81-91.
10. Cuevas-Cerveró, A., Colmenero-Ruiz, M. J., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2023). Critical information literacy as a form of information activism. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102786
11. Cuevas-Cerveró, A., Colmenero-Ruiz, M. J., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2023). Critical information literacy as a form of information activism. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102786
12. Cunningham, A. D., & Rosenblatt, S. (2018). Teaching users: Information and technology instruction. In S. Hirsh (Ed.), Information services today: An introduction (pp. 195–219). Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Drabinski, E., & Tewell, E. (2019). Critical information literacy. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0042
14. Duncan, A., Varcoe, J. (2012). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Students: A Measure of the Effectiveness of Information Literacy Initiatives in Higher Education. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
15. Elmborg, J. (2012). Critical Information Literacy: Definitions and Challenges. In C. Wilkinson (Ed.),Transforming Information Literacy Programs: Intersecting Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Campus Community (pp. 75–95). Association of College & Research Libraries.https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Critical-Information-Literacy-Definitions-and-Challenges/9983557574202771
16. Encheva, M., Tammaro, A. M., & Kumanova, A. (2020). Games to improve students information literacy skills. International Information & Library Review, 52(2), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1746024
17. Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2022). Paradoxes of media and information literacy: the crisis of information (p. 174). Taylor & Francis. DOI.10.4324/9781003163237
18. Hamelink, C. (1976). An alternative to news. Journal of communication, 26(4), 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01947.x (Published: 07 February 2006)
19. Hamid, S., Bukhari, S., Ravana, S. D., Norman, A. A., & Ijab, M. T. (2016). Role of social media in information–seeking behaviour of international students. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(5), 643-666.
20. Hammons, J. (2020). Teaching the teachers to teach information literacy: A literature review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102196
21. Hannah, M. (2023). Information literacy in the age of internet conspiracism . Journal of Information Literacy, 17(1), pp. 204-220http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/17.1.3277
22. Hicks, A., McKinney, P., Inskip, C., Walton, G., & Lloyd, A. (2023). Leveraging information literacy: Mapping the conceptual influence and appropriation of information literacy in other disciplinary landscapes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(3), 548-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221090677
23. Hicks, A., Pilerot, O., Coelho Bezerra, A., Haider, J., Hirvonen, N., Johansson, V., & Schneider, M. (2023). Theorising Information Literacy: Opportunities and Constraints. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 789-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.862
24. Hwang, G. J., Zou, D., & Wu, Y. X. (2023). Learning by storytelling and critiquing: a peer assessment-enhanced digital storytelling approach to promoting young students’ information literacy, self-efficacy, and critical thinking awareness. Educational technology research and development, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10204-5
25. Jacobs, Heidi. 2008. “Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3): 256–262.
26. Jones, K. F. L. V. (2019). Using Evidence from Systematic Reviews. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing,109.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tzWoDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA109&ots=NO4XaqlkbE&sig=F0MjjLNVc2Z97YHDwU1IFkwO6JQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
27. Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American behavioral scientist, 65(2), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
28. Kopp, Bryan M. and Olson-Kopp, Kim. 2010. “Depositories of Knowledge: Library Instruction and the Development of Critical Consciousness.”In Critical Library Instruction: Theories and Methods. Edited by Emily Drabinski, Alana Kumbier, and Maria Accardi. 55–67.
29. Krahmer, D. (2023). Facilitating Critical Information Literacy: Using Intergroup Dialogue to Engage with the Framework. Association of College & Research Libraries.
30. Landøy, A., Popa, D., Repanovici, A., Landøy, A., Popa, D., & Repanovici, A. (2020). Basic concepts in information literacy. Collaboration in designing a pedagogical approach in information literacy, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
31. Lupien, P. & Rourke, L. E. 2021. (Mis)information, information literacy, and democracy: Paths for pedagogy to foster informed citizenship. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(3), pp.56-81.
32. McDonough، Beth Allsopp. 2014.CRITICAL INFORMATION LITERACY IN PRACTICE: AN INTERPRETIVE SYNTHESIS. A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education.
33. Owens, R. (1976). The State Government and Libraries. Library Journal. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=State%20government%20and%20libraries&publication_year=1976&author=M.R.%20Owens
34. Park, H., Kim, H. S., & Park, H. W. (2020). A scientometric study of digital literacy, ICT literacy, information literacy, and media literacy. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 116-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0001
35. Patil, S., (2019). Need of Information Literacy in Higher Education. Library Herald. 57(3):353
36. Pavelić, A., & Špiranec, S. (2021, September). Critical health literacy and critical information literacy: Bridging research discourses from different domains. In European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 52-61). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
37. Perdew, L. (2016). Information literacy in the digital age . ABDO.
38. Polizzi, G. (2020). Information literacy in the digital age: Why critical digital literacy matters for democracy. In S. Goldstein (Ed.) Informed Societies: Why information literacy matters for citizenship, participation, and democracy. Facet.
39. Polizzi, G. (2020). Information literacy in the digital age: Why critical digital literacy matters for democracy. Informed Societies: Why information literacy matters for citizenship, participation and democracy, 1-23.
40. Purnell, M., Royal, B., & Warton, L. (2020). Supporting the development of information literacy skills and knowledge in undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review. Nurse education today, 95, 104585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104585
41. Spiranec, S., Banek Zorica, M., & Kos, D. (2016). Information literacy in participatory environments: the turn towards a critical literacy perspective. Journal of documentation, 72(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2015-0072
42. Supriyanti, S., Permanasari, A., & Khoerunnisa, F. (2020). Correlation Between Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Enhancement Through PjBL-Information Literacy Learning Model. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 774-784
43. Supriyanti, S., Permanasari, A., & Khoerunnisa, F. (2020). Correlation Between Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Enhancement Through PjBL-Information Literacy Learning Model. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 774-784.
44. Swanson, T. A. (2004). A radical step: Implementing a critical information literacy model. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4 (2), 259–273. doi: 10.1353/pla.2004.0038
45. Swanson, T. A. (2004). A radical step: Implementing a critical information literacy model. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(2), 259-273. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0038.
46. Swanson, T. A. (2005). Applying a critical pedagogical perspective to information literacy standards. Community & Junior College Libraries, 12(4), 65–77. doi: 10.1300/J107v12n04_08
47. Taylor, C., & DiGiacomo, D. 2023. Approaches to information literacy conceptualisation in primary, secondary, and higher education contexts: A review of current scholarly literature. Journal of Information Literacy, 17(1), pp. 89–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/17.1.3258
48. Tewell, E. (2015). A decade of critical information literacy: A review of the literature. Communications in information literacy, 9(1), 2. DOI:10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.174
49. Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Related Paper No. 5. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf