تبیین نقش میانجی اشتراک دانش در ارتباط بین هوش مصنوعی و خلاقیت سازمانی (مطالعه موردی: کتابداران کتابخانه‌های علوم پزشکی شهر تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران.
2 گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تأثیر قابلیت‌های هوش مصنوعی بر خلاقیت سازمانی، با تأکید بر نقش میانجی تسهیم دانش، در میان کتابداران کتابخانه‌های دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی مستقر در تهران انجام شده است.

روش‌ پژوهش: روش تحقیق از نوع توصیفی-پیمایشی و از منظر هدف، کاربردی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه کتابداران شاغل در کتابخانه‌های دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی شهر تهران بود. با توجه به محدود بودن حجم جامعه، روش سرشماری برای گردآوری داده‌ها مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و در مجموع ۲۱۴ پرسشنامه تکمیل و وارد تحلیل شد. برای سنجش متغیرهای پژوهش از ابزارهای معتبر و استاندارد بهره گرفته شد. میزان استفاده از هوش مصنوعی از طریق پرسشنامه‌ای ۲۲‌گویه‌ای در پنج بعد (مدیریت هوش مصنوعی، تصمیم‌گیری مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی، زیرساخت هوش مصنوعی، آمادگی برای هوش مصنوعی، و مهارت‌های مرتبط با هوش مصنوعی) که از مطالعه چن و همکاران (۲۰۲۲) اقتباس شده بود، ارزیابی گردید. خلاقیت سازمانی با ابزار 15‌گویه‌ای طراحی‌شده توسط لیائو و وو (2013) سنجیده شد. شاخص تسهیم دانش نیز با استفاده از پرسشنامه داماج و همکاران (۲۰۱۶) شامل ۱۲ گویه ارزیابی گردید. تمامی ابزارها بر اساس طیف پنج‌درجه‌ای لیکرت طراحی شدند. روایی ابزارها از طریق تحلیل روایی همگرا و واگرا و پایایی آن‌ها با محاسبه آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که بین هوش مصنوعی و خلاقیت سازمانی رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. همچنین، هوش مصنوعی اثر مثبت و معناداری بر تسهیم دانش دارد. از سوی دیگر، تسهیم دانش با خلاقیت سازمانی رابطه مثبت و معناداری برقرار می‌سازد.

نتیجه‌گیری: تحلیل‌ها بیانگر آن است که تسهیم دانش به‌عنوان یک متغیر میانجی کامل، نقش مهمی در پیوند میان قابلیت‌های هوش مصنوعی و خلاقیت سازمانی ایفا می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Examining the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence Capabilities and Organizational Creativity: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing (Librarians of Medical Sciences University Libraries)

نویسندگان English

Seifallah Andayesh 1
Zahra Kianrad 2
1 Knowledge and Information Science, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.
2 PhD Knowledge and Information Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction

This study examines the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) utilization and organizational creativity, with knowledge sharing as a mediating variable, among librarians working in medical sciences university libraries in Tehran. AI, as a transformative technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, plays a growing role in enhancing organizational performance through automation, decision support, and improved information management. Literature indicates that AI positively influences creativity and that knowledge sharing reinforces this effect by facilitating exchange, collaboration, and innovative behaviors. Despite increasing global attention to AI capabilities, research in knowledge-intensive environments such as academic libraries remains limited. Addressing this gap, the present study uses a structural equation modeling approach to explore how AI adoption contributes to creativity and how knowledge sharing fully mediates this relationship within library settings.



Methods and Materoal

This applied and quantitative study examines the relationship between artificial intelligence and organizational creativity, considering the mediating role of knowledge sharing among librarians in medical sciences universities in Tehran. Using a census sampling approach, data were collected from 214 librarians between October and December 2024. Validated instruments were employed to assess AI utilization, organizational creativity, and knowledge sharing. Reliability and validity were confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha and convergent/discriminant validity analyses. Structural equation modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS was applied to test the conceptual model and hypotheses, enabling simultaneous evaluation of latent variables, path coefficients, and model fit indices.



Resultss and Discussion

Based on the statistical evidence, the Z-value exceeded the threshold of 1.96, confirming with 95% confidence that knowledge sharing plays a significant mediating role between artificial intelligence (AI) and organizational creativity (P ≤ 0.05). The Variance Accounted For (VAF) index, used to assess the strength of the mediation effect, was calculated as 0.894, indicating full mediation. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) results further demonstrated that AI has a positive and significant effect on organizational creativity (β = 0.501, t = 11.909, P ≤ 0.05), meaning that a one-unit increase in AI utilization results in an average increase of 0.501 standard deviations in creativity. Additionally, AI positively influences knowledge sharing (β = 0.537, t = 9.672, P ≤ 0.05), implying that higher AI adoption leads to improved knowledge sharing. Finally, knowledge sharing itself positively and significantly impacts organizational creativity (β = 0.618, t = 9.853, P ≤ 0.05), suggesting that a one-unit increase in knowledge sharing contributes to a 0.618 standard deviation growth in creativity.



Conclusion

The study highlights the strategic role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing organizational creativity through the mediating effect of knowledge sharing among librarians in medical sciences university libraries. The findings indicate that AI capabilities positively influence both knowledge sharing and organizational creativity, reinforcing previous research and demonstrating that AI functions not only as a technological tool but also as a cognitive and cultural infrastructure that strengthens communication, decision-making, and innovation. Knowledge sharing also significantly promotes creativity by fostering the exchange of experiences, ideas, and expertise, thereby enabling collaborative problem-solving and the generation of novel solutions. Despite its contributions, the research is limited by its focus on a specific population, the use of self-reported data, and its cross-sectional design. The study recommends investing in AI infrastructure, cultivating a strong knowledge-sharing culture, and implementing supportive managerial practices to promote innovation, enhance learning, and achieve sustainable organizational competitiveness.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Artificial intelligence
Organizational Creativity
Knowledge sharing
Librarians
Al-Balushi, H. A., Singh, H., & Saleem, I. (2025). Unlocking sustainable performance in the health-care sector: the dynamic nexus of artificial intelligence, green innovation and green knowledge sharing. Society and Business Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-07-2024-0249
Asemi, A., Ko, A., & Nowkarizi, M. (2021). Intelligent libraries: a review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot. Library Hi Tech, 39(2), 412-434. doi:10.1108/LHT-02-2020-0038
Asim, M., Arif, M., Rafiq, M., & Ahmad, R. (2023). Investigating applications of Artificial Intelligence in university libraries of Pakistan: An empirical study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102803
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard business review, 96(1), 108-116. doi:https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Artificial
El Ardeliya, V., Taylor, J., & Wolfson, J. (2024). Exploration of artificial intelligence in creative fields: Generative art, music, and design. International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, 4(1), 40-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.34306/ijcitsm.v4i1.149
Elsevier. (2018). Artifical Intelligence: How Knowledge is Created, Transferred, and Used. doi:https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Artificial
Fountaine, T., McCarthy, B., & Saleh, T. (2019). Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard business review, 97(4), 62-73. doi:https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Building
Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157-169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
Hussain, S. T., Abbas, J., Lei, S., Jamal Haider, M., & Akram, T. (2017). Transactional leadership and organizational creativity: Examining the mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1361663.
Islam, T., Ahmad, S., Kaleem, A., & Mahmood, K. (2021). Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: moderating roles of Islamic work ethic and learning goal orientation. Management Decision, 59(2), 205-222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-1069
Islam, T., & Asad, M. (2024). Enhancing employees’ creativity through entrepreneurial leadership: can knowledge sharing and creative self-efficacy matter? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(1), 59-73. doi:10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0121
Jacques, B., Michael, C., Raoul, J., James, M., & Jeongmin, S. (2018). McKinsey Global Institute. Notes From the AI Frontier: Modeling the Impact of AI on the World Economy. Retrieved from
Konya, A., & Nematzadeh, P. (2024). Recent applications of AI to environmental disciplines: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 906, 167705. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167705
Li, N., Yan, Y., Yang, Y., & Gu, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence capability and organizational creativity: The role of knowledge sharing and organizational cohesion. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 845277. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845277
Martin, F., Zhuang, M., & Schaefer, D. (2024). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in K-12 education (2017–2022). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100195
McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence. doi:https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
Pinarbasi, F., Sonmez Cakir, F., Güner Gültekin, D., Yazici, M., & Adiguzel, Z. (2024). Examination of the effects of value creation, intellectual property and organizational creativity on artificial intelligence focused enterprises. Business Process Management Journal, 30(1), 317-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2023-0551
Ransbotham, S., Khodabandeh, S., Fehling, R., LaFountain, B., & Kiron, D. (2019). Winning with AI. MIT Sloan management review. doi:https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/winning-with-ai/
Rowell-Jones, A., & Howard, C. (2019). cio survey: Cios have awoken to the importance of ai. Gartner Research, 3. doi:https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title
Shaikh, F., Afshan, G., Anwar, R. S., Abbas, Z., & Chana, K. A. (2023). Analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on employee productivity: the mediating effect of knowledge sharing and well‐being. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(4), 794-820.
Tella, A., & Ajani, Y. A. (2022). Robots and public libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 39(7), 15-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2022-0072
Tredinnick, L. (2017). Artificial intelligence and professional roles. Business Information Review, 34(1), 37-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117692621
Zeb, A., Rehman, F. U., Bin Othayman, M., & Rabnawaz, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT are fostering knowledge sharing, ethics, academia and libraries. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42(1), 67-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2024-0046
Zhou, E., & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS nexus, 3(3), pgae052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052