Explaining the Impact of Market Information Learning Ability and Joint Innovative Capacities on the Organization's Performance with an Information Approach

Authors
1 Departmenet of Governmental Management, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Departmenet of Business Management, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Adjanct Professor, Departmenet of Business Management, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Department of Nuclear Engineering Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Information search strategies change rapidly in continuous mode, and successive searches gradually teach the user what can be retrieved inside the system. Users must be able to interact with the system appropriately to achieve their information needs. The information revolution is not a new issue, but understanding information seeking behavior is important and vital in this era. In future projects, extraordinary efforts should be made to create intelligent systems. Therefore, success or failure in this matter is not the responsibility of the new information technology, but it requires awareness of human needs and his behavior to obtain information. Therefore, in the companies based in Pardis Technology Park, according to the technology-oriented approach and innovation, it is necessary to pay attention to the issue of market information learning and joint innovative capacities to improve the organization's performance. Generally, because the environment and technology are constantly and rapidly changing, and specifically, the demographic characteristics of customers and their expectations undergo changes and transformations, Certainly, in order to have a successful presence in the national and international arena and their dynamism, as well as greater adaptation to environmental changes, these companies should aim to activate their potentials through improving the performance of the organization. In fact, this research seeks to answer the question of what is the role of explaining the effect of market information learning ability and joint innovative capacities on the organization's performance with an information approach?

Methods and Materoal

This research is based on the applied purpose and according to the descriptive type of correlation, according to the model, we should use the structural equation modeling method. The statistical community of the research is top and middle managers of companies that are members of Pardis Technology Park in Tehran. Using Cochran's formula, 384 people were selected as a sample and 400 questionnaires were distributed by available sampling method and 387 questionnaires were collected in 50 companies. The data collection method of this research was done by library method and using books and articles, and questionnaire was used in the field method. To measure the variable of market information learning ability with 7 items, internal learning ability with 10 items, relational learning ability with 7 items and administrative innovation with 6 items from Teece et al., 1997; Weerawardena et al., 2015; and to measure the variable of service innovation with 4 items and organization performance with 5 items from Thakur & Hale, 2013 questionnaire; and to measure the variable of shared innovative capacities with 3 items, Oly Ndubisi et al., 2019 questionnaire was used.



Resultss and Discussion

Demographic characteristics of the sample include gender, age and education. In the method of structural equation modeling, the fit of the model is checked to ensure the accuracy and correctness of the findings before implementing the model to test the hypotheses. Also, Cronbach's alpha indices of combined reliability of average variance were extracted and the coefficient of determination was used to measure the model. The average values ​​of the extracted variance of all 7 model structures are at the optimal level. The amount of Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability is for all model constructs, so the questionnaire has good and acceptable reliability. The amount of Cronbach's alpha and combined reliability for all model constructs is more than 0/7, so the questionnaire has acceptable and acceptable reliability. The value of R2 for the endogenous constructs of the research confirms the appropriateness of the fit of the structural model. The results of the Q2 criterion for the endogenous structure indicate the appropriate predictive power of the model regarding the endogenous constructs of the research and indicate that the fitting model has appropriate and favorable predictive power. Confirmatory factor analysis is used to measure the reliability and validity of the measurement scale. The final results of the confirmatory factor analysis are reported in Table No. 4. Factor loadings greater than 5% have good validity. Figure 1, shows the confirmatory factor analysis for the whole model. Figure 2, shows the analysis of significant coefficients for the whole model. Since all the numbers on the paths are above 1/96%, it indicates the significance of the paths, the appropriateness of the structural model and the confirmation of all research hypotheses. The GOF criterion was used for the overall fit of the model, Since three values ​​of 0/01, 0/25 and 0/36 are determined as weak, medium and strong values ​​for GOF and on the other hand, the coefficient is in a good condition (0/598), Therefore, the results show that the fit of the model in the statistical population of the research is appropriate. Also, the t-test for all hypotheses is greater than 1/96. Therefore, with 95% confidence, the relationship between the variables is significant.

Conclusion

The present research was done by explaining the effect of market information learning ability and joint innovative capacities on the performance of the organization with an information approach. Organizational performance is a valuable activity at the community level. It also has a fundamental role in the economy and is considered as a useful tool to achieve economic growth and benefits of the organization. In fact, it is like an umbrella that includes all concepts related to the success and activities of the entire organization. In this research, 7 hypotheses were tested and the results of the hypothesis analysis indicate that the ability to learn market information plays a role in the internal learning ability (0/945) and the ability to learn interfaces (0/785) and internal learning ability (0/220) and interface learning ability (0/662) have been effective on administrative innovation. Also, administrative innovation has had an effect on the organization's performance (0/488), and shared innovative capacities have a significant effect on service innovation (0/904). Finally, service innovation has played a role in the organization's performance (0/590).
Keywords

مروتی، مرضیه؛ ریاحی‌نیا، نصرت؛ و عظیمی، علی (1402). جنبش دسترسی آزاد در بحران همه‌گیری کووید-۱۹: تلاش‌های جامعه جهانی. تعامل انسان و اطلاعات، (۱0)۴، 1-20.
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052]
احمدی، مجید؛ فریدچهر، الهام؛ و احمدی، محمد (1398). ارزیابی نقش خودکارآمدی و تمایلات اجتماعی در قصد و رفتار خرید سبز. محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار، 7(4), 145-162.
Choi, K., Jean, R.J.B., & Kim, D. (2019). The impacts of organizational learning capacities on relationship-specific innovations: Evidence from the global buyer-supplier relationship. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 1042-1066. [DOI:10.1108/IMR-07-2017-0130]
باقری، قدرت‌الله؛ شهپرتوفیق، آزیتا؛ طر یقی، مجتبی؛ و دلدار، ابراهیم (1396). ارتباط بین بازاریابی داخلی و سکوت سازمانی در اداره کل ورزش و جوانان استان قم. پژوهش‌های کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی، 5(4)، 61070.
Constantinescu, M. (2009). Knowledge management: focus on innovation and labor productivity in a knowledge-based economy. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 7-33.
هداوند، مجتی؛ و کزازی، روح‌اله (1401). بررسی تاثیر سازمان یادگیرنده بر عملکرد سازمان با نقش میانجی رفتارهای نوآورانه (نوآوری باز) (مورد مطالعه: سازمان هواشناسی کشور). مطالعات رفتاری در مدیریت، 13(1). 160-183.
Durst, S., Hinteregger, C., & Zieba, M. (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.002]
میجانی، میترا؛ روستا، علیرضا؛ و جمشیدی، داریوش (1400) استفاده از رویکرد خلاقانه اعتیاد به برند جهت توسعه مدل خرید مجدد محصولات لوکس. ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 19(4)، 113-142.
Eng, T., & Ozdemir, S. (2014). International R&D partnerships and intrafirm R&D marketing production integration of manufacturing firms in emerging economies. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 32-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.013]
محمددرینی، ولی؛ و آذری یکتا، فرزانه (1401). تأثیر سیستم‌های کنترل داخلی بر شدت نوآوری و عملکرد سازمانی، با نقش میانجی رهبری تحول آفرین: مطالعه موردی دانشگاه پیام نور. پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، 16(3), 63-79.
Fierro Moreno, E., LuisCantù Mata, J., Martînez Bello, J., & Hernân Lôpez, O. (2015). Predictors of administrative innovation: functions and organizational methods (Mexican and Colombian hospitals). Rev. bus. manag., São Paulo, 17(54), 806-821. [DOI:10.7819/rbgn.v17i54.1820]
پهلوانی قمی، مجید؛ و بهزادنیا، مهرداد (1402). بررسی تأثیر قابلیت تحلیل کسب و کار بر عملکرد سازمانی از طریق کیفیت اطلاعات و قابلیت نوآوری در زمان شیوع کووید ۱۹، نهمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی علوم مدیریت و حسابداری، تهران.
Hietajärvi, A-M., Aaltonen, K., & Haapasalo, H. (2017). What is project alliance capability?. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(2), 404-422. [DOI:10.1108/IJMPB-07-2016-0056]
رستگار، عباسعلی؛ باقری قره‌بلاغ؛ و عین‌علی، محسن (1398). هوشمند واکاوی نقش ابتکار استراتژیک و تاب‌آوری بر عملکرد سازمانی. مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، 10(4)، 127-148.
Huang, C.C., & Huang, S.M. (2020). External and internal capabilities and organizational performance: Does intellectual capital matter?. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(2), 111-120.


Jameel, S. (2019). The Role of Emotional Intelligence on Achieving Administrative Innovation. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 351-364. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.12.001]
Ahmadi, M., Faridchehr, E., & Ahmadi, M. (2019). Assessing the role of self efficacy and social tendencies in green purchase intention and behaviour. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 7(4), 145-162. (in Persian)
Kim, D., Chiou, J.S., & Calantone, R. (2018). Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships. International Business Review, 27(4), 838-851. [DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.007]
Ahmadi, M., & Rousta, A. (2021). Explaining the Jihadi Performance of Managers with Emphasis on the Holy Quran, Nahj al-Balagha and the Wise Statements of Grand Ayatollah Khamenei. New Approaches to Jihadi Management and Islamic Governance, 1(3), 80-100. (in Persian)
Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). Service innovation in product-centric firms: A multidimensional business model perspective. J. Bus. Ind. Mark, 29, 96-111. [DOI:10.1108/JBIM-08-2013-0165]
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052]
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R.P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing?. Journal of Marketing, 75, 16-30. [DOI:10.1509/jm.75.1.16]
Azimi, H., Hosseinpour, A. (2023). The impact of market orientation on organizational performance with the mediating role of learning orientation (Case Study: Pegah, Telecom and Pars Switch Companies). Industrial Technology Development Quarterly, Volume 21, Number 51. (in Persian)
Lam, A (2005). Organizational innovation. Edited by Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R.R. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 115-147), Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0005]
Azizi, M., Rahimi, M., & Kabiri, F. (2021). Presenting a causal model of factors affecting the development of organizational performance based on green intellectual capital and green innovation. Journal of Business Management, 13(49), 449-466. (in Persian)
Leal-Millán, A., Roldán, J.L., Leal-Rodríguez, AL., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2016). IT and relationship learning in networks as drivers of green innovation and customer capital: Evidence from the automobile sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 444-464. [DOI:10.1108/JKM-05-2015-0203]
Bagheri, G.A., Shahpar Tawfigh, A., Zarifi, M., & Deldar, E. (2017). The relationship between Internal Marketing and organizational silence in Qom sport and youth departments. Applied Research in Sport Management, 5(4), 61-70. (in Persian)
Lousã, E.P., & Mónico, L. (2018). How can leadership and organizational culture predict innovation in small, medium and large enterprises?. The Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 1-15. DOI: 10.5171/2018.703891. [DOI:10.5171/2018.703891]
Choi, K., Jean, R.J.B., & Kim, D. (2019). The impacts of organizational learning capacities on relationship-specific innovations: Evidence from the global buyer-supplier relationship. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 1042-1066. [DOI:10.1108/IMR-07-2017-0130]
Martins, J.T. (2016). Relational capabilities to leverage new knowledge: Managing directors' perceptions in UK and Portugal old industrial regions. The Learning Organization, 23(6), 398-414. [DOI:10.1108/TLO-03-2016-0022]
Constantinescu, M. (2009). Knowledge management: focus on innovation and labor productivity in a knowledge-based economy. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 7-33.
Mavondo, F.T., Chimhanzi, J., & Stewart, J. (2005). Learning orientation and market ori-entation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11/12), 1235-1263. [DOI:10.1108/03090560510623244]
Dehghani Soltani, M., Masnavipour, M. (2023). The effect of knowledge management on organizational performance by explaining the mediating role of strategy implementation. The 9th International Conference on Management and Accounting Sciences, Abadan. (in Persian)
Mohammed Al-Nashmi, M. (2017). The Relationship between Administrative Innovation and Competitive Advantage in Yemeni Private Universities. The Arab Journal For Quality Assurance In Higher Education, 10(29), 181-199. [DOI:10.20428/ajqahe.v10i29.1173]
Durst, S., Hinteregger, C., & Zieba, M. (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.002]
Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naude, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009]
Eng, T., & Ozdemir, S. (2014). International R&D partnerships and intrafirm R&D marketing production integration of manufacturing firms in emerging economies. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 32-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.013]
Oly Ndubisi, N., Dayan, M., Yeniaras, V., & Al-hawari, M. (2019). The effects of complementarity of knowledge and capabilities on joint innovation capabilities: The role of competitive intensity and demand uncertainty. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 196-208. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.011]
Fierro Moreno, E., LuisCantù Mata, J., Martînez Bello, J., & Hernân Lôpez, O. (2015). Predictors of administrative innovation: functions and organizational methods (Mexican and Colombian hospitals). Rev. bus. manag., São Paulo, 17(54), 806-821. [DOI:10.7819/rbgn.v17i54.1820]
Palacios-Marqués, D., Fernando Gallego-Nicholls, J., & Guijarro-García, M. (2021). A recipe for success: Crowdsourcing, online social networks, and their impact on organizational performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 165. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120566]
Hadavand, M., & Kazzazi, R.A. (2022). Investigating the impact of the learning organization on the organization's performance with the mediating role of innovative behaviors (open innovation) (Case Study: National Meteorological Organization). Journal of Behavioral Studies in Management, Volume 13, Number 32, 160-183. (in Persian)
Palacios-Marqués, D., García, M.G., Sánchez, M.M., & Mari, M.P.A. (2019). Social entrepreneurship and organizational performance: A study of the mediating role of distinctive competencies in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 101, 426-432. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.004]
Hietajärvi, A-M., Aaltonen, K., & Haapasalo, H. (2017). What is project alliance capability?. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(2), 404-422. [DOI:10.1108/IJMPB-07-2016-0056]
Santos-Vijande, M-L., López-Sánchez, J-Á., Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline employees' collaboration in industrial service innovation: routes of co-creation's effects on new service performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350-375. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-015-0447-4]
Hoshyar, V., & Nazari, F. (2022). Examining the impact of internal control systems on organizational performance with an emphasis on the role of innovation and transformational leadership (Case Study: Mashhad Municipality). The 10th international conference on modern accounting, management and human sciences research in the third millennium, Tehran. (in Persian)
Scott, W-R., & Davis, G-F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Huang, C.C., & Huang, S.M. (2020). External and internal capabilities and organizational performance: Does intellectual capital matter?. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(2), 111-120. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.12.001]
Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021). Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: the moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27, 1, 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139]
Jafari, H., & Pirayesh, R. (2022). Investigating the impact of establishing strategic management on organizational performance with the mediating role of organizational entrepreneurship (Case Study: Zanjan industrial town companies). 3rd National Conference and 2nd International Conference on Business Sustainability, Ahvaz. (in Persian)
Talebi, K., & Bahamir, A. (2012). Identification of intellectual capital effects on promoting organizational entrepreneurship (Charmahal-E bakhtiari ministry of cooperatives, labour and social welfare). ZENITH International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 2(6), 37-48.
Jameel, S. (2019). The Role of Emotional Intelligence on Achieving Administrative Innovation. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 351-364.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.CO;2-Z]
JanNesar Ahmadi, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of attitude towards change on organizational performance. The 9th International Conference on Management and Accounting Sciences, Abadan. (in Persian)
Thakur, R., & Hale, D. (2013). Service innovation: A comparative study of US and Indian service firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1108-1123. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.007]
Kim, D., Chiou, J.S., & Calantone, R. (2018). Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships. International Business Review, 27(4), 838-851. [DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.007]
Vladimirov, Z., & Williams, A. (2018). Hotel innovations and performance: The mediating role of staff related innovations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 28, 166-178. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2018.08.010]
Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). Service innovation in product-centric firms: A multidimensional business model perspective. J. Bus. Ind. Mark, 29, 96-111. [DOI:10.1108/JBIM-08-2013-0165]
Wang, C-N., Day, J-D., & Farid, M. (2019). Service Innovation Model of the Automobile Service Industry. Applied Sciences, 9 (12), 1-16. [DOI:10.3390/app9122403]
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R.P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing?. Journal of Marketing, 75, 16-30. [DOI:10.1509/jm.75.1.16]
Wang, J., Omar, A.H., Alotaibi, F.M., Daradkeh, Y.I., & Althubiti, S.A. (2022). Business intelligence ability to enhance organizational performance and performance evaluation capabilities by improving data mining systems for competitive advantage. Information Processing & Management, 59(6), 103075. [DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103075]
Lam, A (2005). Organizational innovation. Edited by Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R.R. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 115-147), Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0005]
Weerawardena, J., & O'Cass, A. (2004). Exploring the characteristics of the market-driven firms and antecedents to sustained competitive advantage. Industrial marketing management, 33, 419-428. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.07.002]
Leal-Millán, A., Roldán, J.L., Leal-Rodríguez, AL., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2016). IT and relationship learning in networks as drivers of green innovation and customer capital: Evidence from the automobile sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 444-464. [DOI:10.1108/JKM-05-2015-0203]
Weerawardena, J., Salunke, S., Knight, G., Sullivan Mort, G., & Liesch, P. (2019). The learning subsystem interplay in service innovation in born global service firm internationalization. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 181-195. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.012]
Lousã, E.P., & Mónico, L. (2018). How can leadership and organizational culture predict innovation in small, medium and large enterprises?. The Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 1-15. DOI: 10.5171/2018.703891. [DOI:10.5171/2018.703891]
Weerawardena, J., Sullivan Mort, G., Salunke, S., Knight, G., & Liesch, P. (2015). The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 221-239. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-014-0382-9]
Martins, J.T. (2016). Relational capabilities to leverage new knowledge: Managing directors' perceptions in UK and Portugal old industrial regions. The Learning Organization, 23(6), 398-414. [DOI:10.1108/TLO-03-2016-0022]
Mavondo, F.T., Chimhanzi, J., & Stewart, J. (2005). Learning orientation and market ori-entation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11/12), 1235-1263. [DOI:10.1108/03090560510623244]
Meijani, M., Rousta, A., & Jamshidi, D. (2021). Employing the creative approach of brand addiction to develop a model of repurchasing luxury products. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 10(4), 113-142. (in Persian)
MohammadDarini, V., Azari Yekta, F. (2022). The effect of internal control systems on the intensity of innovation and organizational performance, with the mediating role of transformational leadership: Case Study: Payam Noor University. Educational Systems Research Quarterly, Volume 16, Number 59. (in Persian)
Mohammed Al-Nashmi, M. (2017). The Relationship between Administrative Innovation and Competitive Advantage in Yemeni Private Universities. The Arab Journal For Quality Assurance In Higher Education, 10(29), 181-199. [DOI:10.20428/ajqahe.v10i29.1173]
Morovati, M., Riahinia, N., Azimi, A. (2024). The open access movement in the Covid-19 pandemic crisis: The world community's efforts. Human Information Interaction, 10(4), 1-20. (in Persian)
Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naude, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009]
Oly Ndubisi, N., Dayan, M., Yeniaras, V., & Al-hawari, M. (2019). The effects of complementarity of knowledge and capabilities on joint innovation capabilities: The role of competitive intensity and demand uncertainty. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 196-208. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.011]
Pahlavani Qomi, M., & Behzadnia, M. (2023). Investigating the impact of business analysis capability on organizational performance through information quality and innovation capability during the outbreak of covid-19. The 9th International Conference on Management and Accounting Sciences, Abadan. (in Persian)
Palacios-Marqués, D., Fernando Gallego-Nicholls, J., & Guijarro-García, M. (2021). A recipe for success: Crowdsourcing, online social networks, and their impact on organizational performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 165. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120566]
Palacios-Marqués, D., García, M.G., Sánchez, M.M., & Mari, M.P.A. (2019). Social entrepreneurship and organizational performance: A study of the mediating role of distinctive competencies in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 101, 426-432. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.004]
Rastgar, A.A., Bagheri Garbollagh, H., & Eynali, M. (2020). Analyze the Role of Strategic Initiative and Resilience in Organizational Performance. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(40), 107-128. (in Persian)
Rezaei, R. (2017). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance of the Jihad-e-Agriculture organization in West Azerbaijan Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research (IJAEDR), 47(4), 865-877. (in Persian)
Salami, H., Zarif Manesh, H., Tavalaei, M., Pousadegh, N., & Mohaddes, H. (2021). A Model for Assessing the Outcomes of Organizational Performance in Imam Khamenei's Thought. Strategic Defense Studies, 19(84), 63-84. (in Persian)
Santos-Vijande, M-L., López-Sánchez, J-Á., Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline employees' collaboration in industrial service innovation: routes of co-creation's effects on new service performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350-375. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-015-0447-4]
Scott, W-R., & Davis, G-F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021). Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: the moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27, 1, 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139]
Talebi, K., & Bahamir, A. (2012). Identification of intellectual capital effects on promoting organizational entrepreneurship (Charmahal-E bakhtiari ministry of cooperatives, labour and social welfare). ZENITH International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 2(6), 37-48.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.CO;2-Z]
Thakur, R., & Hale, D. (2013). Service innovation: A comparative study of US and Indian service firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1108-1123. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.007]
Vladimirov, Z., & Williams, A. (2018). Hotel innovations and performance: The mediating role of staff related innovations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 28, 166-178. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2018.08.010]
Wang, C-N., Day, J-D., & Farid, M. (2019). Service Innovation Model of the Automobile Service Industry. Applied Sciences, 9 (12), 1-16. [DOI:10.3390/app9122403]
Wang, J., Omar, A.H., Alotaibi, F.M., Daradkeh, Y.I., & Althubiti, S.A. (2022). Business intelligence ability to enhance organizational performance and performance evaluation capabilities by improving data mining systems for competitive advantage. Information Processing & Management, 59(6), 103075. [DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103075]
Weerawardena, J., & O'Cass, A. (2004). Exploring the characteristics of the market-driven firms and antecedents to sustained competitive advantage. Industrial marketing management, 33, 419-428. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.07.002]
Weerawardena, J., Salunke, S., Knight, G., Sullivan Mort, G., & Liesch, P. (2019). The learning subsystem interplay in service innovation in born global service firm internationalization. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 181-195. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.012]
Weerawardena, J., Sullivan Mort, G., Salunke, S., Knight, G., & Liesch, P. (2015). The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 221-239. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-014-0382-9]
Zeraat Pisheh, A. (2022). The impact of human resource planning systems on organizational performance (Case Study: employees of Shiraz municipality). The 8th National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Smart City, Tehran. (in Persian)