تحلیل جستجوی اینترنتی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی رشته‌ی مهندسی علوم آبِ دانشگاه شهید‌چمران با مدل «فرایند جستجوی اطلاعات» کولثاو

نویسندگان
زاهد بیگدلی
آتوسا کوچک
دانشگاه شهید چمران
چکیده
زمینه و هدف: همگام با روند تغییر پارادیم در حوزه­ی اطلاع­یابی از رویکرد نظام­مدار به کاربرمدار طراحی نظام­هایی برای پیشبرد اهداف اطلاع­یابی ضروری به نظر می­رسد. موفقیت این حوزه مستلزم تعامل متقابل کاربران با نظام و ایجاد رابطه بین اطلاع­یابی و بازیابی اطلاعات است. با ورود فناوری­های جدید به حوزه­ی اطلاع­یابی مدل­هایی ابداع شدند که روند جستجوی اطلاعات را به عنوان فعالیتی پویا ارائه می‌دهند و چگونگی رفع نیاز اطلاعاتی کاربر را توصیف می­کنند. پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی فرآیند جستجوی اطلاعات دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی دانشکده مهندسی علوم آبِ دانشگاه شهید چمران در اینترنت و مقایسه­ی رفتاراطلاع­یابی آنها با مدل "فرآیند جستجوی اطلاعات" کولثاو صورت گرفت.

روش پژوهش: نوع پژوهش حاضرکاربردی و روش پژوهش، پیمایشی توصیفی بوده­است . جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل دانشجویان کارشناسی دانشکده مهندسی علوم آب دانشگاه شهید چمران به تعداد 204 نفر بوده که با استفاده از نمونه­گیری تصادفی، تعداد نمونه­ها 102 نفر (51 نفر از دانشجویان سال اول و 51 نفر از دانشجویان سال آخر) تعیین و پرسشنامه­ها میان آنها توزیع گردید.

یافته ­ها: تحلیل داده­ها نشان داد که از میان مراحل مدل کولثاو، دو مرحله "شروع " و "انتخاب"، توسط دانشجویان ورودی سال اول و آخر نادیده گرفته شده­اند و چهار مرحله­ی "کاوش"، "فرمول بندی"، " گردآوری" و "ارائه" در اولویت استفاده اعضاء نمونه قرار داشته و مراحل " کاوش" و "گردآوری"، بهترین مراحلی است که کتابداران می­توانند در فرایند جستجو مداخله نمایند. همچنین تحلیل داده ها آشکار کرد که دانشجویان از "پایگاههای­اطلاعاتی"، موتورکاوش و راهنمای موضوعی به یک اندازه استفاده می­کنند و همچنین از دو ابزار جستجو نظیر" عنوان" و "عملگر NOT"، نسبت به سایر ابزارهای جستجو، استفاده بیشتری به عمل می آورند.

نتیجه­ گیری: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که الگوی مورد استفاده دانشجویان، برخلاف تعداد و ترتیب مدل کولثاو، از یک فرایند 4 مرحله­ای تشکیل شده ­است. در نهایت با استناد به نتایج تحقیق حاصل از مقایسه­ی دو گروه نمونه، الگوی جدید جستجوی اینترنتی دانشجویان، شناسایی و پیشنهاد گردید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
جستجوی اطلاعات
مدل کولثاو
الگوی جستجو
دانشجوی کارشناسی مهندسی علوم آب
دانشگاه شهید چمران

عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the Internet search process of B.Sc. undergraduate students in Field of Water Science Engineering of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz with the model of "information seeking process" of Kuhlthau

نویسندگان English

Zahed Bigdeli
Atousa Koochak
Shahid chamran university
چکیده English

Background and Aim: With changes in the paradigm of information seeking field and the replacement of system-based approach by user-based one, it seems necessary to design systems to achieve Information seeking goals. This requires mutual interactions of users and systems and establishing relationships between information seeking and information retrieval. A number of models were created after the introduction of new technologies into information seeking field which present information search trends as dynamic activities and describe how to meet the users’ demands. The research attempted to investigate how the undergraduates of the Water Sciences Engineering School of Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz searched the information on the Internet and then compare their “information seeking” behavior with Kuhlthau “information search process”.

Methods: This was an applied research using descriptive survey method. The statistical population was comprised of all undergraduates of the Water Sciences Engineering School of Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz (N=204) out of whom 102 subjects (51 freshmen and 51 sophomores) were selected via random sampling who received questionnaires.

Results: The data analysis revealed that from the stages of Kuhlthau model, freshmen and seniors tended to ignore “beginning” and “Selection stages”. Subjects would prioritize four stages of “exploration”, “formulation”, “collection” and “presentation” while “exploration” and “collection” stages were the best stages for the intervention of librarians in the search process. Also, data analysis showed that the students used “information bases”, search engines and topic indices equally while they employed search tools such as “Title” and “N operator” more than other search tools.

Conclusion: The results revealed that the pattern used by students was comprised of 4 stages which were in contrast to kuhlthau model in both terms of the number and order of stages. In the end, a new internet search pattern used by students was recognized and presented through the results obtained from the comparisons of both groups of subjects.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Information
Search
Kuhlthau model
Search pattern
Water Science Engineering undergraduate
Shahid Chamran University
Refrences
Adhami, A. (2003). A look at the models of information behavior and information behavior on the web. Informational research and public libraries, 13(3-4), 43-51[In Persion].
Beheshti, J., Cole, C., Abuhimed, D., & Lamoureux, I. (2015). Tracking middle school students' information behavior via Kuhlthau's ISP Model: Temporality. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 943-960.
Belkin, N. (2000). Prospects for information'selection': Presentation for UCAO.
Bigdeli, Z., Faraj Pahloo, A., & Ghazizadeh, H. (2011). Comparison of the Web search process of graduate students of Shahid Chamran University with the model of the search process for collecting information in order to provide their Internet search pattern and the textbook intervention plan for searching. Library and Information(54), 11-44 [In Persion].
Burdick, T. A. (1996). Gender in the information search process: An exploratory study of student experience.
Cole, C., Beheshti, J., Abuhimed, D., & Lamoureux, I. (2015). The end game in Kuhlthau's ISP Model: Knowledge construction for grade 8 students researching an inquiry‐based history project. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2249-2266.
Cooper, L. Z. (2002). A case study of information‐seeking behavior in 7‐year‐old children in a semistructured situation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 904-922.
Feather, J., & Sturges, P. (2003). International encyclopedia of information and library science: Routledge.
Friel, L. (1996). The information research process with low-achieving freshman using Kuhlthau's six-stage model and the interventions that facilitate the process.
Ghazi Dezfuli, S. S. (2012). Searching for information on the Internet by computer students and comparing them with Kultau's Model. National Library Studies and Information Organization(90), 102-121[In Persion].
Ghazizadeh, H. (2011). Comparison of Internet information search process of the postgraduate students of Chamran University with Kuhlthau ISP model to present their internet search pattern. (PHD), Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz.
Griffiths, J. R. (2003). Evaluation of the JISC Information Environment: student perceptions of services. Information Research, 8(4), 8-4.
Hayden, K. A. (2001). Information seeking models. Retrieved September, 8, 2008.
Hyldegård, J. (2006). Collaborative information behaviour––exploring Kuhlthau’s Information Search Process model in a group-based educational setting. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 276-298.
Islami, A., & Keshavarz, H. (2007). Study of the Information Retrieval Skills in Electronic Resources in PhD Students at the Faculty of Geography of Tehran University. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 23(1&2), 46-61[In Persion].
Kiani, M. R. (2012). Evaluation Approaches to Information Retrieval Systems: Background and
Outlook Perspectives. library and Information(58), 243-258 [In Persion].
Kline, P. I. (1994). An Easy Guideto Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2007). Reflections on the development of the model of the Information Search Process (ISP): Excerpts from the Lazerow Lecture, University of Kentucky, April 2, 2007. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 33(5), 32-37.
Kuhlthau, C. C., Heinström, J., & Todd, R. J. (2008). The ‘information search process’ revisited: Is the model still useful. Information Research, 13(4), 13-14.
MACPHERSON, K. (2002). THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENHANCED INFORMATION RETRIEVAL STRATEGIES IN UNDERGRADUATES THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF LEARNING THEORY: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. University of Canberra.
Maltby, J. R., & Whittle, J. (2000). Learning programming online: Student perceptions and performance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2000 Conference.
Manuel, K. (2005). What do first-year students know about information research? And what can we teach them? Paper presented at the Currents and Convergence: Navigating the Rivers of Change, Proceedings of the ACRL 12th National Conference.
Nokarizi, M., & Narmenjee, S. (2009). An Investigation of the Internet Anxiety of Graduate Students of Birjand and Ferdowsi Universities in the Information Search Process". Quarterly journal of information science and technology, 25(1), 111-129 [In Persion].
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2011). Research methods in behavioral science. Tehran: Agah [In Presian].
Shamo, E. (2003). University students and the Internet: Information seeking study.
Stelmaszewska, H., & Blandford, A. (2002). Patterns of interactions: user behaviour in response to search results. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the JCDL Workshop on Usability of Digital Libraries Usability of Digital Libraries 2002.
Struyven, K., Janssens, S., & Dochy, F. (2002). Students' perceptions about assessment in higher education: a review.
Swain, D. E. (1996). Information Search Process Model: How Freshmen Begin Research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting.
Whitmire, E. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and the information-seeking behavior of undergraduates. Library & Information Science Research, 25(2), 127-142.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of documentation, 55(3), 249-270.
تعامل انسان و اطلاعات
دوره 5، شماره 1
بهار 1397
صفحه 44-58