معرفی و بررسی انطباقی مدلهای ارزیابی اعتبار وب

Alexander, J. E.; Tate, M. A. (1999). Web wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beck, S. E. (1997). The good, the bad & the ugly, or, why it’s a good idea to evaluate web sources. Re-trieved May 13, 2016, from www.ucolick.org/~max/Astro18-2014/GoodBadUgly.pdf
Choi, W. (2015). A New framework of web credibility assessment and an exploratory study of older adults’ information behavior on the web. Un-published doctoral dissertation, Florida state uni-versity, Florida.
Cool, C., Belkin, N. J., Frieder, O., & Kantor, P. (1993). Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judg-ments. Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting.
Credibility. (2011). In Oxford Advanced American dictionary for learners of English. China: Oxford University Press.
Flanagin, A. J.; Metzger, M. J. (2008). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprec-edented responsibility. In M. J. Metzger, & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media,youth, and credibil-ity (pp. 5-27). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fogg, B.; Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Confer-ence on Human factors in Computing Systems: the CHI is the Limit, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (pp. 80-87). New York, NY: ACM.
Fogg, B. J. (2003a). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Fogg, B. J. (2003b). Prominence-interpretation theory. In G. Cockton, & P. Korhonen (Eds.),CHI '03 Ex-tended Abstracts on Human Factors in Compu-ting Systems (pp. 722-723).New York, NY: ACM.
Harris, R. (1997). Evaluating internet research sources. Retrieved May 13, 2016, from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.html
Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unify-ing framework of credibility assessment: Con-struct, heuristics, and interaction in context. In-formation Processing & Management,44(4), 1467-1484.
Hong, T. (2006). The influence of structural and mes-sage features on Web site credibility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 114-127.
Jessen, J.; Jørgensen, A. H. (2012). Aggregated trust-worthiness: Redefining online credibility through social validation. First Monday, 17(1).
Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school stu-dents find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 12-17.
Liu, Z. (2004). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the Web. Information Processing & Management, 40, 1027-1038.
Liu, L.; Chi, L. (2002). Evolutional data quality: a theory-specific view. In International Conference on Information Quality, (ICIQ-02). Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Infor-mation Quality, Nov. 8-10, (292-304). Retrieved April 10, 2016, from http://mitiq.mit.edu/ICIQ/Documents/IQ%20Confer-ence%202002/Papers/EvolutionalDataQualityATheorySpecificView.pdf
Lucassen, T., Muilwijk, R., Noordzij, M. L., & Schraa-gen, J. M. (2013). Topic familiarity and infor-mation skills in online credibility evaluation. Jour-nal of the American Society for Information Sci-ence and Technology, 64(2), 254-264.
Lucassen, T., & Schraagen, J. M. (2011). Factual ac-curacy and trust in information: The role of exper-tise. Journal of the American Society for Infor-mation Science and Technology, 62(7), 1232-1242.
Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online infor-mation and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091.
Naumann, F.; Rolker, C. (2000). Assessment methods for information quality criteria. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Information Quality. Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Information Quality, October 20-21, (148-162). Retrieved March 15, 2016, from http://mitiq.mit.edu/ICIQ/iqpapers.aspx?iciqyear=2000
Razzaghi, A. (2002). Theories of social communica-tion. Tehran: Peykan. (Persian)
Rieh, S. Y.; Belkin, N. J. (1998). Understanding judg-ment of information quality and cognitive author-ity in the WWW. Proceedings of the American So-ciety for Information Science, 35, 279-289.
Rieh, S. Y.; Kim, Y.-M.; Yang, J. Y. & St. Jean, B. (2010). A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the web: Preliminary findings. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10.
Shah, A. A., Ravana, S. D., Hamid, S., Ismail, M. A. (2015). Web credibility assessment: affecting fac-tors and assessment techniques. Information Re-search, 20(1), paper 655 Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/20- 1/paper655.html
Song, J.; Zahedi, F. M. (2007). Trust in health info-mediaries. Decision Support Systems, 43 (2), 390-407.
Stvilia, B.; Twidale, M. B.; Smith, L. C. & Gsdrt, L. (2005). Assessing information quality of a com-munity-based encyclopedia. In International Conference on Information Quality. Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Information Quality., Nov. 4-6, (423-436). Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://mitiq.mit.edu/iciqpapers.aspx?iciqyear=2005
Stvilia, B.; Gasser, L.; Twidale, M. B. & Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality as-sessment. Journal of the American Society for In-formation Science and Technology, 58(12), 1720-1733.
Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger, & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73-100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134-144.
Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An in-quiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Creenwood Press.
Zuh, X.; Gauch, S. (2000). Incorporating quality met-rics in centralized/distributed information retrieval on the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information re-trieval. 23rd ACM International SIGIR Confer-ence on Research and Development in Infor-mation Retrieval, July 24-28, (288-295). New York: ACM (Association for Computing Machin-ery).